http://www.aisjca-mft.org//badlinks.htm

l'inchiesta si arena e nessun giornalista ne parla più.<br>

7)&nbsp; Durante il corso dell'anno 2002 o

è mai stato prodotto.<br>

8)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Durante il corso dell'anno 2002 o

prodotto. <br>

            </blockquote>

Si confronti adesso quanto

qui riferito con la descrizione dell'arma ad

energia diretta, simile ad un telecomando, contenuta nel mio resoconto

e soprattutto nel suo aggiornamento. Personalmente ritengo che

l'ipotesi del dispositivo ad ultrasuoni non regga ad un'analisi tecnica

e siano da preferirsi l'ipotesi del LASER infrarosso o, ancor meglio,

quella relativa all'impiego di una nuova e sconosciuta tecnologia,

magari la stessa impiegata per compiere il trattamento che nel mio

resoconto ho denominato &#8220;SQUID&#8221;.<br>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px;"> <br>

Alla "telepatia artificiale" possono credere solo persone di

mentalità

particolarmente aperta o che le abbiano subite in prima persona, come

me. Già i riferimenti all'arma nel letale simile ad un

telecomando sono

più facili da digerire per un pubblico non introdotto a questi

argomenti. Ma per quanto riguarda il nuovo file, esso:<br>

            </div>

            <blockquote>1) Testimonia una

incredibile opera di cover-up

successivo

e non preventivo, che può essere costato anche qualche vita

(vedi

Landi) e sicuramente qualche blocco psicologico ai giornalisti

coinvolti.<br>

2) È legato a fatti di cronaca che, seppur per la maggior parte

non più

reperibili, hanno ricevuto attenzione da parte dei media "ufficiali" e

non solo dagli organi di "controinformazione".<br>

3) Potrebbe facilmente essere riscontrato dal grande pubblico, in

quanto le notizie che cito hanno ricevuto una certa diffusione anche se

non sono ancora state correlate tra loro. Anche organi di pubblica

sicurezza o di intelligence potrebbero trovarvi la chiave di lettura di

alcuni "misteri" italiani.<br>

4) Rappresentano la situazione italiana del 2002/2003, in cui il nostro

paese sembra avere una sovranità davvero limitata: notizie

cancellate,

film che scompaiono, ecc. Ha idea dell'impatto che questi fatti

potrebbero avere sull'opinione pubblica del nostro paese se venissero

comunemente riconosciuti?<br>

            </blockquote>

Faccio un esempio: ci sono

innumerevoli teorie "complottiste" dietro al

crollo delle Torri Gemelle, ma NESSUNA cita il possibile uso di armi

non letali per il dirottamento (fornite da chi ed a quale scopo?)

nonostante il fatto che la notizia sia uscita su di un telegiornale

nazionale. Che fine hanno fatto le fonti che l'hanno riferita? Come mai

nessun giornalista sembra averla considerata? Dall'altra parte ci sono

circa 3000 morti e per qualcuno averne uno in più o in meno

potrebbe

non fare alcuna differenza.<br>

            </div>

            <hr style="font-style: italic;" align="justify" size="2" width="100%">

            <div align="justify"><br style="font-style: italic;">

            <a style="font-style: italic;" name="temporary_incapacitation"></a><span style="font-style: italic;">As

an executive

branch </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.onr.navy.mil/en.aspx"><b>agency within

the Department of Defense, the Office of Naval Research (ONR</b>)</a>

supports the President's budget. ONR provides technical advice to the

Chief of Naval Operations and the Secretary of the Navy. <a style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.onr.navy.mil/Contracts-Grants/small-business.aspx">Office

of Small Business</a><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"> </span><br>

            <br>

            </div>

            <div align="center">Temporary personnel

incapacitation system called MEDUSA <br>

(Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) <br>

            </div>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px;" align="justify"> <i>Summary

Information. Objective of

Phase Effort

The main goal of the Phase I project wad to design and build a

breadboard prototype of a temporary personnel incapacitation system

called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio). This

non-lethal weapon is based on the well established microwave auditory

effect (MAE). MAE results in a strong sound sensation in the human head

when it is irradiated with specifically selected microwave pulses of

low energy. Through the combination of pulse parameters and pulse

power, it is possible to raise the auditory sensation to the

individuals. </i><br>

            </div>

            <h3 style="text-align: center;"><img src="line1.gif" title="" alt="" style="width: 650px; height: 6px;"></h3>

            <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"><a href="http://mcmailteam.blogspot.com/2008/09/you-can-help-us-with-more-maillists.html" style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">EMAIL LISTS URGENTLY

NEEDED!</a><br>

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://mcmailteam.blogspot.com/"><img src="MCmail.jpg" title="" alt="World Wide MCmailteam Blog: WORLDWIDE MOVEMENT AGAINST ABUSE OF REMOTE MANIPULATION WEAPONS" style="border: 0px solid ; width: 393px; height: 322px;" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="10"></a>You can help us with <b>more

maillists</b><br>

already have. <br>

            <div align="left">A) We still need LISTS for as many

POLITICS, PSYCHOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY,

SCIENCE, MEDICINE, LAW, HISTORY etc. departments, staff and

associations at as many UNIVERSITIES, COLLEGES and INSTITUTIONS

WORLDWIDE as we can get.<br>

            <br>

B) We still need LISTS for as many top level MILITARY AND SECURITY

PEOPLE, ORGANISATIONS AND ESTABLISHMENTS worldwide as we can get. <br>

            </div>

            <blockquote>C) We still need LISTS for all the

CORPORATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND

ASSOCIATIONS etc. involved in the development and production of these

technologies. For example:-Raytheon, Lockeed Martin, Boeing, Northrop

Grumman, General Dynamics and United technologies, SAIC and all the

others.<br>

D) We still need LISTS for RELIGIOUS HEAD OFFICES, INSTITUTIONS,

ORDERS, CLERGY AND MEMBERS WORLDWIDE etc..If everyone could supply at

least one EMAIL LIST it would help. And any other influential or

powerful organisations and people that you can think of.<br>

E) We need email lists of all these people and organisations - so we

can make them aware of these technologies and crimes - and any other

influential or powerful organisations and people that you can think of!

Please make LISTS and send them to us at

as WORD DOCUMENTS or IN THE BODY OF THE EMAIL.</blockquote>

            </div>

            </div>

            </td>

          </tr>

          <tr>

            <td>

            <blockquote><i><br>

              </i> </blockquote>

            <div style="text-align: justify; margin-left: 40px;"><i><i>A

large portion

of

the

investment, about

$9 million, has been devoted to characterizing the effects

of this

technology on the human body..... Animals and

humans are

being

used in the test program which is being conducted in strict compliance

with the procedures, laws and regulations governing animal and human

experimentation"

(?). "The tests are reviewed and approved by a formal Institutional

Review

Board with oversight from the <a href="http://www.tricare.mil/tma/aboutTMA/sea/links.aspx">Air

Force Surgeon General&#8217;s Office</a>.

An

independent

panel of medical experts from outside the government also periodically

reviews and advises on the planning aspects and results of the research

and test activities. Their 2002 review of the program concluded there

is

low probability of serious injury from exposure to the ADS beam.

Additionally,

the panel concludes that the probability of thermal eye injury is low

and

the probability of long-term health effects such as cancer is extremely

low.</i></i></div>

            <blockquote>

              <div style="text-align: justify;"><i> </i></div>

              <i> </i></blockquote>

            <i> </i>

            <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><i><i>Le

citazioni precedenti derivano da fonti

"polemiche", ma qui citiamo invece dati dalle

fonti originarie come queste:<br>

            </i> </i>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i><b><a href="http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/">From

the

Editor</a></b> of <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://www.carlisle.army.mil/">Carlysle Army</a>: Article on the

            <b><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/">Parameters

portion of the

Army

Website</a></b>:<a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/98spring/thomas.htm"><b>The

Mind Has No

Firewall</b></a> by <b><a href="http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/">Timothy

L. Thomas</a></b>.

Parameters,

Spring 1998, pp. 84-92. Parameters

is a refereed journal of ideas and issues, providing a forum for the

expression of mature professional thought on the art and science of

land warfare, joint and combined matters, national and international

security affairs, military strategy, military leadership and

management, military history, military ethics, and other topics of

significant and current interest to the <b><a href="http://www.defense.gov/">US Army and

Department of Defense</a></b>.

It serves as a vehicle for continuing the education and professional

development of USAWC graduates and other senior military officers, as

well as members of government and academia concerned with national

security affairs. <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"><br>

            <br>

            </span></i></i></div>

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i>Lieutenant Colonel

Timothy L. Thomas (USA Ret.) is an analyst at the <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/">Foreign Military

Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas</a>.<br>

            </i> </i></div>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i>Recently

he has written

extensively on the Russian view of information operations

and on current Russian military-political issues. During his military

career he served in the 82d Airborne

Division and was the <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.google.it/search?hl=it&amp;q=Department+Head+of+Soviet+Military-Political+Affairs&amp;btnG=Cerca&amp;meta=">Department

Head of Soviet

Military-Political Affairs</a>

at the <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ35VSP9C7w">US

Army's Russian Institute</a>

in Garmisch, Germany.<a href="http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/research_reports/researchreport2.php#%27Exotic%27%20Weapons%20Systems">

It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such

weapons will achieve incomparable superiority</a>. -- Major I.

Chernishev, Russian army[1] The <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/">Army's Foreign

Military Studies Office (FMSO)</a> is

a research and analysis

center under the <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://breakingdefense.com/tag/tradoc/">U.S.

Army's Training and Doctrine Command</a>, Intelligence

Support Activity (TRISA). FMSO manages and operates the Ft.

Leavenworth Joint Reserve Intelligence Center (JRIC)

and conducts analytical programs focused on emerging and asymmetric

threats, regional military and security developments, and other issues

that define evolving operational environments around the world. Joint

Reserve Component personnel and units&#8211;operating at the Ft.

production efforts.<br style="font-weight: bold;">

            </i> </i></div>

            <i> <img style="width: 650px; height: 6px; font-weight: bold;" alt="" src="line1.gif" vspace="10"><br style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">

            </i>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px; font-weight: bold;">

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><i><font face="Garamond"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/military-tech/">About

Military Tech</a>

The military establishment's ever increasing reliance on technology and

whiz-bang gadgetry impacts us as consumers, investors, taxpayers and

ultimately as the "defended." Our mission here is to bring some of

these products and concepts to your attention based on carefully

selected criteria such as importance to national security, originality,

collateral damage to the treasury and adaptability to yard

maintenance-but not necessarily in that order.<br style="font-style: italic;">

            </font></i> </div>

            <i> <i><font face="Garamond"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-9893082-42.html">Mark

Rutherford</a> is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an

employee of CNET<br>

            </font></i> </i></div>

            <i> <br>

            <a style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-10018808-42.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">"DENIABLE"?

/ NON LASCIA TRACCE?</a><br>

August 18,

2008 7:41 AM PDT <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-10018808-42.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Invisible

airborne laser also

'deniable'</a> Posted

by Mark

Rutherford<br style="font-weight: bold;">

            </i>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i>Enemy

combatants are close to feeling the heat from an airborne laser weapon

called the "long-range blowtorch" and, if officials at US Air Force are

right, nobody will know what hit them. The 5.5-ton Advanced

Tactical

Laser (ATL) combines

chlorine and hydrogen peroxide molecules to release energy that

stimulates iodine into an intense infra-red, silent and invisible laser

with a 20 kilometres striking range. New

Scientist reports that both

Cynthia Kaiser, chief engineer of the US <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.kirtland.af.mil/Units/AFRL-Directed-Energy-Directorate">Air

Force

Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate</a> and

John Corley, director of

USAF's Capabilities Integration Directorate, used the phrase "plausible

deniability"

at industry briefings to describe one of the weapon's advantages,

namely "that the US could convincingly deny any involvement

with the

destruction it causes".

"The

target would never know what hit them," John Pike, an analyst with

defense think-tank Global Security told New Scientist. "Further, there

would be no munition fragments that could be used to identify the

source of the strike." Besides the covert - plausible deniability

angle, other pros to this 100KW-class <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.l-3com.com/brashear/products/laserbeam/atl.html">high

energy laser</a> include "ultra speed of light engagement" and

pinpoint accuracy, according to <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.boeing.com/bds/">Boeing</a>.<br>

Boeing

recently tested the <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.l-3com.com/brashear/products/laserbeam/atl.html">ATL</a>

at Kirtland Air Force Base Base N.M., firing the high-energy chemical

laser

through a rotating turret mounted on the belly of a Hercules C-130H.

The company claims the

weapons is accurate enough to pick off a vehicle's tires.

"This is a major step toward providing the ultra-precision engagement

capability that the warfighter needs to dramatically reduce collateral

damage,"

said Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of Boeing

Missile Defense Systems. A larger version that can pick an incoming

ICBM out of the sky will be mounted on a Boeing 747, according to the

Chicago, Illinois based company. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w-ql8msl0U">(Video)</a> The U.S.

Navy is seeking its

own version to take out "small boat threats"<br>

            <br>

            </i> </i></div>

            <i> </i>

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i>Citiamo da una mail

/quoted from a mail<br>

            </i> </i></div>

            <i> </i>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i>The

US

Air Force says

that because there are no munition fragments that could be used to

identify the source of the strike from their Advanced

Tactical Laser (ATL).

Because of this they say that it is "deniable".

Meaning

that the US could convincingly deny

any involvement with

the destruction&nbsp;the weapon&nbsp;causes.<br style="font-style: italic;">

The

concern is that the weapons being used on victims can also be

convincingly "deniable".<img style="width: 560px; height: 11px;" alt="" src="eye_bar.gif" vspace="10"><br>

            </i> </i></div>

            <i> </i>

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><i> </i></div>

            <i> </i>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i> </i>

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i><a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise/">MEDUSA

Phase I Summary Report</a>.:<br style="font-style: italic;">

Summary

Information

Objective of Phase Effort <br style="font-style: italic;">

The main

goal of the Phase I project wad to design and build a breadboard

prototype of a temporary personnel

incapacitation system called <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise/">MEDUSA

(Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio)</a>.

This non-lethal weapon is based on the well established microwave

auditory effect (MAE). MAE results in a strong sound sensation in the

human head when it is irradiated with specifically selected microwave

pulses of low energy. Through the combination of pulse parameters and

pulse power, it is possible to raise the auditory sensation to the

individuals.<br style="font-style: italic;">

Potential

Applications and Benefits <br style="font-style: italic;">

            </i> </i>

            <div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i>Potential

applications of the MEDUSA

system are as a perimeter protection sensor in deterrence systems

for industrial and national sites, for use in systems to assist

communication with hearing

impaired persons, use by law enforcement and military

personnel for crowd

control and asset

protection. The system will:<br>

            </i> </i></div>

            <i> </i></div>

            <i> <i>be

portable, require low power, have a controllable radius of coverage, be

able to switch from crowd to individual coverage, cause a temporarily

incapacitating effect, have a low probability of fatality or permanent

injury, cause no damage to property, and have a low probability of

affecting friendly personnel.<br>

            </i> </i></div>

            <i> </i></td>

          </tr>

          <tr>

            <td><img style="width: 650px; height: 6px;" alt="" src="line1.gif" vspace="10"><br>

            <br>

            <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><a name="laser"></a>LASER</span>?

Una parola misteriosa? Uno "strumento diabolico"? <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Light

Amplification by

Stimulated Emission

of Radiation</span><span style="font-style: italic;">...</span><br>

            <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span style="font-style: italic; font-family: garamond;">Science

Insider</span><br style="font-style: italic; font-family: garamond;">

            <div style="text-align: justify;"> <span style="font-style: italic; font-family: garamond;">HOW

LASERS WORK: <span style="font-weight: bold;">"Laser"</span>

is an <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">acronym

for Light

Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation</span>.

It describes any device that creates and amplifies a narrow, focused