(vedi
Landi) e sicuramente qualche blocco psicologico ai giornalisti
coinvolti.<br>
2) È legato a fatti di cronaca che, seppur per la maggior parte
non più
reperibili, hanno ricevuto attenzione da parte dei media "ufficiali" e
non solo dagli organi di "controinformazione".<br>
3) Potrebbe facilmente essere riscontrato dal grande pubblico, in
quanto le notizie che cito hanno ricevuto una certa diffusione anche se
non sono ancora state correlate tra loro. Anche organi di pubblica
sicurezza o di intelligence potrebbero trovarvi la chiave di lettura di
alcuni "misteri" italiani.<br>
4) Rappresentano la situazione italiana del 2002/2003, in cui il nostro
paese sembra avere una sovranità davvero limitata: notizie
cancellate,
film che scompaiono, ecc. Ha idea dell'impatto che questi fatti
potrebbero avere sull'opinione pubblica del nostro paese se venissero
comunemente riconosciuti?<br>
</blockquote>
Faccio un esempio: ci sono
innumerevoli teorie "complottiste" dietro al
crollo delle Torri Gemelle, ma NESSUNA cita il possibile uso di armi
non letali per il dirottamento (fornite da chi ed a quale scopo?)
nonostante il fatto che la notizia sia uscita su di un telegiornale
nazionale. Che fine hanno fatto le fonti che l'hanno riferita? Come mai
nessun giornalista sembra averla considerata? Dall'altra parte ci sono
circa 3000 morti e per qualcuno averne uno in più o in meno
potrebbe
non fare alcuna differenza.<br>
</div>
<hr style="font-style: italic;" align="justify" size="2" width="100%">
<div align="justify"><br style="font-style: italic;">
<a style="font-style: italic;" name="temporary_incapacitation"></a><span style="font-style: italic;">As
an executive
branch </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.onr.navy.mil/en.aspx"><b>agency within
the Department of Defense, the Office of Naval Research (ONR</b>)</a>
supports the President's budget. ONR provides technical advice to the
Chief of Naval Operations and the Secretary of the Navy. <a style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.onr.navy.mil/Contracts-Grants/small-business.aspx">Office
of Small Business</a><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"> </span><br>
<br>
</div>
<div align="center">Temporary personnel
incapacitation system called MEDUSA <br>
(Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) <br>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" align="justify"> <i>Summary
Information. Objective of
Phase Effort
The main goal of the Phase I project wad to design and build a
breadboard prototype of a temporary personnel incapacitation system
called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio). This
non-lethal weapon is based on the well established microwave auditory
effect (MAE). MAE results in a strong sound sensation in the human head
when it is irradiated with specifically selected microwave pulses of
low energy. Through the combination of pulse parameters and pulse
power, it is possible to raise the auditory sensation to the
“discomfort” level, deterring personnel from entering a protected
perimeter or, if necessary, temporarily incapacitating particular
individuals. </i><br>
</div>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><img src="line1.gif" title="" alt="" style="width: 650px; height: 6px;"></h3>
<hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"><a href="http://mcmailteam.blogspot.com/2008/09/you-can-help-us-with-more-maillists.html" style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">EMAIL LISTS URGENTLY
NEEDED!</a><br>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://mcmailteam.blogspot.com/"><img src="MCmail.jpg" title="" alt="World Wide MCmailteam Blog: WORLDWIDE MOVEMENT AGAINST ABUSE OF REMOTE MANIPULATION WEAPONS" style="border: 0px solid ; width: 393px; height: 322px;" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="10"></a>You can help us with <b>more
maillists</b><br>
We also need email lists for all AUTHORITIES, INSTITUTIONS,
LEADERS, ORGANISATIONS, CORPORATIONS etc. WORLDWIDE that we don't
already have. <br>
<div align="left">A) We still need LISTS for as many
POLITICS, PSYCHOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY,
SCIENCE, MEDICINE, LAW, HISTORY etc. departments, staff and
associations at as many UNIVERSITIES, COLLEGES and INSTITUTIONS
WORLDWIDE as we can get.<br>
<br>
B) We still need LISTS for as many top level MILITARY AND SECURITY
PEOPLE, ORGANISATIONS AND ESTABLISHMENTS worldwide as we can get. <br>
</div>
<blockquote>C) We still need LISTS for all the
CORPORATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND
ASSOCIATIONS etc. involved in the development and production of these
technologies. For example:-Raytheon, Lockeed Martin, Boeing, Northrop
Grumman, General Dynamics and United technologies, SAIC and all the
others.<br>
D) We still need LISTS for RELIGIOUS HEAD OFFICES, INSTITUTIONS,
ORDERS, CLERGY AND MEMBERS WORLDWIDE etc..If everyone could supply at
least one EMAIL LIST it would help. And any other influential or
powerful organisations and people that you can think of.<br>
E) We need email lists of all these people and organisations - so we
can make them aware of these technologies and crimes - and any other
influential or powerful organisations and people that you can think of!
Please make LISTS and send them to us at
as WORD DOCUMENTS or IN THE BODY OF THE EMAIL.</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<blockquote><i><br>
</i> </blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify; margin-left: 40px;"><i><i>A
large portion
of
the
investment, about
$9 million, has been devoted to characterizing the effects
of this
technology on the human body..... Animals and
humans are
being
used in the test program which is being conducted in strict compliance
with the procedures, laws and regulations governing animal and human
experimentation"
(?). "The tests are reviewed and approved by a formal Institutional
Review
Board with oversight from the <a href="http://www.tricare.mil/tma/aboutTMA/sea/links.aspx">Air
Force Surgeon General’s Office</a>.
An
independent
panel of medical experts from outside the government also periodically
reviews and advises on the planning aspects and results of the research
and test activities. Their 2002 review of the program concluded there
is
low probability of serious injury from exposure to the ADS beam.
Additionally,
the panel concludes that the probability of thermal eye injury is low
and
the probability of long-term health effects such as cancer is extremely
low.</i></i></div>
<blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i> </i></div>
<i> </i></blockquote>
<i> </i>
<hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><i><i>Le
citazioni precedenti derivano da fonti
"polemiche", ma qui citiamo invece dati dalle
fonti originarie come queste:<br>
</i> </i>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i><b><a href="http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/">From
the
Editor</a></b> of <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://www.carlisle.army.mil/">Carlysle Army</a>: Article on the
<b><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/">Parameters
portion of the
Army
Website</a></b>:<a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/98spring/thomas.htm"><b>The
Mind Has No
Firewall</b></a> by <b><a href="http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/">Timothy
L. Thomas</a></b>.
Parameters,
Spring 1998, pp. 84-92. Parameters
is a refereed journal of ideas and issues, providing a forum for the
expression of mature professional thought on the art and science of
land warfare, joint and combined matters, national and international
security affairs, military strategy, military leadership and
management, military history, military ethics, and other topics of
significant and current interest to the <b><a href="http://www.defense.gov/">US Army and
Department of Defense</a></b>.
It serves as a vehicle for continuing the education and professional
development of USAWC graduates and other senior military officers, as
well as members of government and academia concerned with national
security affairs. <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"><br>
<br>
</span></i></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i>Lieutenant Colonel
Timothy L. Thomas (USA Ret.) is an analyst at the <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/">Foreign Military
Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas</a>.<br>
</i> </i></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i>Recently
he has written
extensively on the Russian view of information operations
and on current Russian military-political issues. During his military
career he served in the 82d Airborne
Division and was the <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.google.it/search?hl=it&q=Department+Head+of+Soviet+Military-Political+Affairs&btnG=Cerca&meta=">Department
Head of Soviet
Military-Political Affairs</a>
at the <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ35VSP9C7w">US
Army's Russian Institute</a>
in Garmisch, Germany.<a href="http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/research_reports/researchreport2.php#%27Exotic%27%20Weapons%20Systems">
It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such
weapons will achieve incomparable superiority</a>. -- Major I.
Chernishev, Russian army[1] The <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/">Army's Foreign
Military Studies Office (FMSO)</a> is
a research and analysis
center under the <a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="http://breakingdefense.com/tag/tradoc/">U.S.
Army's Training and Doctrine Command</a>, Intelligence
Support Activity (TRISA). FMSO manages and operates the Ft.
Leavenworth Joint Reserve Intelligence Center (JRIC)
and conducts analytical programs focused on emerging and asymmetric
threats, regional military and security developments, and other issues
that define evolving operational environments around the world. Joint
Reserve Component personnel and units–operating at the Ft.
Leavenworth JRIC
and in distance drilling analytical teams around the U.S. and
abroad--make substantial contributions
to all FMSO
production efforts.<br style="font-weight: bold;">
</i> </i></div>
<i> <img style="width: 650px; height: 6px; font-weight: bold;" alt="" src="line1.gif" vspace="10"><br style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">
</i>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-weight: bold;">
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i><font face="Garamond"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/military-tech/">About
Military Tech</a>
The military establishment's ever increasing reliance on technology and
whiz-bang gadgetry impacts us as consumers, investors, taxpayers and
ultimately as the "defended." Our mission here is to bring some of
these products and concepts to your attention based on carefully
selected criteria such as importance to national security, originality,
collateral damage to the treasury and adaptability to yard
maintenance-but not necessarily in that order.<br style="font-style: italic;">
</font></i> </div>
<i> <i><font face="Garamond"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-9893082-42.html">Mark
Rutherford</a> is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an
employee of CNET<br>
</font></i> </i></div>
<i> <br>
<a style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-10018808-42.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">"DENIABLE"?
/ NON LASCIA TRACCE?</a><br>
August 18,
2008 7:41 AM PDT <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-10018808-42.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Invisible
airborne laser also
'deniable'</a> Posted
by Mark
Rutherford<br style="font-weight: bold;">
</i>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i>Enemy
combatants are close to feeling the heat from an airborne laser weapon
called the "long-range blowtorch" and, if officials at US Air Force are
right, nobody will know what hit them. The 5.5-ton Advanced
Tactical
Laser (ATL) combines
chlorine and hydrogen peroxide molecules to release energy that
stimulates iodine into an intense infra-red, silent and invisible laser
with a 20 kilometres striking range. New
Scientist reports that both
Cynthia Kaiser, chief engineer of the US <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.kirtland.af.mil/Units/AFRL-Directed-Energy-Directorate">Air
Force
Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate</a> and
John Corley, director of
USAF's Capabilities Integration Directorate, used the phrase "plausible
deniability"
at industry briefings to describe one of the weapon's advantages,
namely "that the US could convincingly deny any involvement
with the
destruction it causes".
"The
target would never know what hit them," John Pike, an analyst with
defense think-tank Global Security told New Scientist. "Further, there
would be no munition fragments that could be used to identify the
source of the strike." Besides the covert - plausible deniability
angle, other pros to this 100KW-class <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.l-3com.com/brashear/products/laserbeam/atl.html">high
energy laser</a> include "ultra speed of light engagement" and
pinpoint accuracy, according to <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.boeing.com/bds/">Boeing</a>.<br>
Boeing
recently tested the <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.l-3com.com/brashear/products/laserbeam/atl.html">ATL</a>
at Kirtland Air Force Base Base N.M., firing the high-energy chemical
laser
through a rotating turret mounted on the belly of a Hercules C-130H.
The company claims the
weapons is accurate enough to pick off a vehicle's tires.
"This is a major step toward providing the ultra-precision engagement
capability that the warfighter needs to dramatically reduce collateral
damage,"
said Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of Boeing
Missile Defense Systems. A larger version that can pick an incoming
ICBM out of the sky will be mounted on a Boeing 747, according to the
Chicago, Illinois based company. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w-ql8msl0U">(Video)</a> The U.S.
Navy is seeking its
own version to take out "small boat threats"<br>
<br>
</i> </i></div>
<i> </i>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i>Citiamo da una mail
/quoted from a mail<br>
</i> </i></div>
<i> </i>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><i><i>The
US
Air Force says
that because there are no munition fragments that could be used to
identify the source of the strike from their Advanced
Tactical Laser (ATL).
Because of this they say that it is "deniable".
Meaning
that the US could convincingly deny
any involvement with
the destruction the weapon causes.<br style="font-style: italic;">
The
concern is that the weapons being used on victims can also be
convincingly "deniable".<img style="width: 560px; height: 11px;" alt="" src="eye_bar.gif" vspace="10"><br>
</i> </i></div>
<i> </i>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i> </i></div>
<i> </i>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i> </i>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i><a style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise/">MEDUSA
Phase I Summary Report</a>.:<br style="font-style: italic;">
Summary
Information
Objective of Phase Effort <br style="font-style: italic;">
The main
goal of the Phase I project wad to design and build a breadboard
prototype of a temporary personnel
incapacitation system called <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise/">MEDUSA
(Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio)</a>.
This non-lethal weapon is based on the well established microwave
auditory effect (MAE). MAE results in a strong sound sensation in the
human head when it is irradiated with specifically selected microwave
pulses of low energy. Through the combination of pulse parameters and
pulse power, it is possible to raise the auditory sensation to the
“discomfort” level, deterring personnel from entering a protected
perimeter or, if necessary, temporarily incapacitating particular
individuals.<br style="font-style: italic;">
Potential
Applications and Benefits <br style="font-style: italic;">
</i> </i>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><i><i>Potential
applications of the MEDUSA
system are as a perimeter protection sensor in deterrence systems
for industrial and national sites, for use in systems to assist
communication with hearing
impaired persons, use by law enforcement and military
personnel for crowd
control and asset
protection. The system will:<br>
</i> </i></div>
<i> </i></div>
<i> <i>be
portable, require low power, have a controllable radius of coverage, be
able to switch from crowd to individual coverage, cause a temporarily
incapacitating effect, have a low probability of fatality or permanent
injury, cause no damage to property, and have a low probability of
affecting friendly personnel.<br>
</i> </i></div>
<i> </i></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img style="width: 650px; height: 6px;" alt="" src="line1.gif" vspace="10"><br>
<br>
<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><a name="laser"></a>LASER</span>?
Una parola misteriosa? Uno "strumento diabolico"? <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Light
Amplification by
Stimulated Emission
of Radiation</span><span style="font-style: italic;">...</span><br>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span style="font-style: italic; font-family: garamond;">Science
Insider</span><br style="font-style: italic; font-family: garamond;">
<div style="text-align: justify;"> <span style="font-style: italic; font-family: garamond;">HOW
LASERS WORK: <span style="font-weight: bold;">"Laser"</span>
is an <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">acronym
for Light
Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation</span>.
It describes any device that creates and amplifies a narrow, focused
beam of light whose photons are all traveling in the same direction,
rather than emitting every which way at once. Lasers can be configured
to emit many different colors in the spectrum, but each laser can emit
only a single color. There are many different types of laser, but all
of them have an empty cavity containing a lasing medium: either a
crystal like ruby or garnet, or a gas or liquid. There are two mirrors
on either end of the cavity, one of which is half-silvered, meaning
that it will reflect some light and let some light through. In a laser,
the atoms or molecules of the lasing medium are "pumped" by applying
intense flashes of light or electricity. The end result is a sudden
burst of so-called "coherent" light as all the atoms discharge in a
rapid chain reaction.</span><br>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><a href="http://www.cnr.it/commesse/CommessaDescr.html?id_comm=6130" style="font-weight: bold;">L'attività di ricerca sui
processi
di interazione laser materia</a> si colloca in un contesto
Europeo e
mondiale di attività all'avanguardia nel campo delle
nanotecnologie, biologia, medicina, applicazioni industriali e studi
per la conservazione e qualificazione di beni culturali. Questa
attività altamente interdisciplinare, condivisa da fisici,
chimici e ingegneri, rappresenta una sfida per l'identificazione di
problemi critici nel campo dei materiali e dei processi per la loro
produzione. La possibilità di scoprire soluzioni innovative
attraverso le <span style="font-weight: bold;">tecnologie
laser</span>
potrebbe consentire lo sviluppo di nuove opportunità per la
produzione di materiali avanzati per applicazioni nella micro e
nanoelettronica, ottica, fotonica e per modificazioni superficiali di
metalli, polimeri e biomateriali. Tale attività fornisce una
base per interpretare i meccanismi elementari indotti dall'interazione
laser-materia e fornire, con i più avanzati metodi
computazionali, dei modelli utili all'interpretazione dei fenomeni
coinvolti tanto da definire la dinamica ultrarapida delle specie
transienti che partecipano al processo e definendo così i loro
effetti sulle proprietà dei prodotti finali.</span><br>
</div>
<br>
Una
bizzarra curiosità? (vedi Tavola I: <b><i>Aurora
Boreale</i></b>) <font style="font-weight: bold;" color="#d70023">Laser
verde</font> in <a href="http://www.trovaprezzi.it/prezzo_kit-luci-effetti_laser_verde.aspx" style="font-weight: bold;">libera vendita offresi</a>: per un
prezziario
Americano che va da circa 90 a circa 2.000 dollari, vedi
l'affolatissimo - più di 2500
visitatori al giorno - file <a href="http://www.amazing1.com/categories/lasers.html"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Laser